Working Up

by Dwayne Phillips

Giving advice? Do we do what we advise?

Quick point: an ethical person will only consult, advise, recommend, etc. only things that they do themselves.

There are limits. If I advise a company to buy a million-dollar computer system, that is ethical even though I don’t have a million-dollar computer system myself as I don’t need one.

Nevertheless, I advise people to do a little, fail a little, learn a little, repeat. If I am not practicing that, I cannot ethically advise that. There are many examples of advice:

• write every day
• write in a journal
• read every day
• read things that you don’t understand
• experiment every day

The list is endless. I do the above items, so I advise them for others.

by Dwayne Phillips

Leaving room for learning is a good practice, as long as I continue to fill those empty rooms.

I write a lot. I write much more than the average person—whom I have yet to meet.

I know English grammar better than the average person. Most average persons could care less about that. There is much about English grammar that I have yet to learn. That is fine, so long as I continue to learn.

I suppose that the the point of the matter. It is fine to not know everything about something so long as I continue to learn. When I don’t know about something and refuse to learn, then I have hit a wall or something bad.

Partial ignorance is fine. Refusal to learn, not so fine.

by Dwayne Phillips

Some people work on big data. The rest of us find value by working on data that is bigger than we can understand without some hand-crafted tools.

For about two years I worked on a BIG DATA project. Well, that is how it was touted. BIG DATA was a cool name that impressed people. Me? I tried not to giggle or grimace when those words were spoken and those PowerPoints were blazoned across screens in the far flung reaches of the fruited plain.

Walmart was my favorite example when persons would pull me to the side and ask for clarifications. Consider every Walmart in America and the world. That’s a big number. Consider every cash register at every Walmart. That’s a big(ger) number. Consider every customer going through every cash register at every Walmart. That big number continues to be BIGGER. Consider every purchase by every customer at … I hope by now you have the BIG DATA picture in your mind. Walmart is an example of BIG DATA. They do gazillions of transactions every second of every day. They track and analyze every one.

Walmart does BIG DATA.

We analyzed relationships among persons related to significant events. Every one of our analysts knew what questions to ask. Given a couple dozen persons and one event, the analyst could pin things on the wall, connect them with yarn, and have those cool displays like on the Hallmark Movies and Mysteries channel.

The trouble was, we didn’t have a couple dozen persons, we had 200,000 persons. We didn’t have a big enough wall and enough yarn to find the answers. And no one had the time or helpers to do the job. The data is bigger than a person can analyze.

We did BIG(er) DATA.

We solved these bigger data problems by hand crafting little tools that helped us do this and that and answer the fundamental questions that every analyst knew.

• Just show me the activities of 4 July 2020.
• Just show me the persons with college degrees.
• Just show me the telephone numbers with area code 202.
• Just show me…

The “just show me” items would move on and on until we reduced 200,000 persons to two or three persons. There was the answer.

BIG DATA? No.

BIG(ger) DATA? Yes.

Value added? Yes.

Sometimes you just need to change the topic by a couple or three letters for it all to make sense.

by Dwayne Phillips

What type of person are you trying to hire? The questions you ask answer this question. Please listen to yourself.

Do you want a scientist or a technician or a clerk?

Technicians and clerks are easy to find. Ask what tools they’ve used.

Finding a scientist or analyst or other thinker … Now you have to think a while before asking a question.

For example, I have worked as a systems engineer. Many persons in the computing industry confuse the term “systems engineer” with “system administrator.” They are easy to confuse.

Jobs for system administrators use the names of tools: Linux, Windows, server, Docker, etc.

Jobs for systems engineers use terms related to thinking: requirements, ideas, concepts. Oooh. That is sort of fuzzy, hard to put your finger on those things. Concrete things are missing. What do we talk about? How do I judge if a person can think? This hurts my head.

Here’s a tip: Ask the prospective scientist something like, “How often do you think about the scientific process and its nuances?”

by Dwayne Phillips

Ah, my car will drive itself. I can rest, read, think about things. Really? Perhaps we aren’t comfortable with the answer to the question posed in the title.

Who will really benefit from self-driving vehicles?

Alcohol, canabis, and pharmaceutical industries. This includes restaurants and bars that serve these. The vehicle itself is the designated driver, and we all have a designated river all the time.

And there are some medicines that say, “Do not drive after taking this.” Okay, I won’t.

And let’s toss in the doctors who perform procedures on us. “You will need someone to drive you home afterwards.” Simple.

Sex and pornography. The porn industry always benefits from new technologies that enable entertainment. And since we aren’t paying attention to driving, we are available for entertainment.

Content creators. The pornography one extends to this. Like to read books (paper and electronic)? Read all you want because you aren’t driving.

Hotel and Motels. Since we can do all sorts of things while driving, we will take more road trips and stay in more motels.

I see the best benefit is that those who cannot drive due to physical and mental issues will have access to transportation. Those persons, however, are in a small minority when compared to the persons mentioned above.

Is this good news or bad?

by Dwayne Phillips

An age-old question that won’t seem to go away.

Odd how things come around. I keep a file with ideas for blog posts. I jotted some notes for this post about six months ago. I was perusing that file and noticed this. While the context of that note jotting months ago was completely different, it is exactly the same. Hmmm, timely?

The topic of this question is the person who will placate. That is, the placating person will place the other person on a pedestal to never be disturbed. The other person will poke and prod and such, but the placating person will continue to move along without a protest, without a,

“Hey, I exist. I matter as much as you.”

A rational person can state that others are placating because they are satisfied.

In the same situation, a rational person can state that others are placating because their position renders them unable to act otherwise.

Events can reverse the roles. The placating person can assert themselves loudly enough so that the other person shrinks and placates the now-assertive person.

The new-found assertiveness changes everything, but leaves us in the same situation: one person is all important while one person is completely submissive. Progress? Perhaps, perhaps not.

What we seek, and what we may never achieve, is that one person, the other person, and the context are all equal. (Yes, the context, the culture and our society, is important as well.)

by Dwayne Phillips

Not sure where to put these words? What is the right place? The right time?

I have this idea. I know the right concept. I have a document in the works. Let’s see. Where does this go? When does it go in the time? How about, I don’t know. Let me think…

Stop. Right here. Right now. Just type it (or write it if you are using a pencil and paper).

You are here and now. It is here and now. Perhaps this is the perfect place and time for it.

Just type it.

Later—and there always is a let—you can move it. For now,

Just type it.

by Dwayne Phillips

Similar to the signal-to-noise ratio is the knowledge-to-opinion ratio. Watch for it.

sig·nal-to-noise ra·tio
noun

the ratio of the strength of an electrical or other signal carrying information to that of interference, generally expressed in decibels.

The signal-to-noise ratio used to be important to most of us. While riding in a car, we would “tune” (remember tuning a radio?) our AM or FM radio to a station. A little tweak this way or that would improve the signal-to-noise so that we could understand the song or the talker. Ah, the old analog days. Not so much anymore. Just click to the right satellite channel or enter the URL to the desired podcast and there we are.

Too bad most of us have lost the thought of the signal-to-noise ratio as it becomes more difficult to understand the knowledge-to-opinion ratio. We have confused knowledge and opinion, don’t know the difference between them, and therefore cannot find a ratio of them.

Here’s a tip: opinions come with adjectives. Notice a few adjectives? You are reading or hearing an opinion, not knowledge.

“Mr. so-and-so was in such-and-such city yesterday.” That is knowledge of Mr. so-and-so, such-and-such city, and the calendar.

That statement had no opinion, so the knowledge-to-opinion ratio is high.

“The dastardly Mr. so-and-so appeared in the otherwise peaceful such-and-such city yesterday, which is usually an observance of a wonderful day.”

See the adjectives? dastardly, peaceful, wonderful.

That second statement added opinion to the knowledge. Hence, the knowledge-to-opinion ratio is lower.

This is pretty simple. I would call it common sense, but such is not commonly practiced.

by Dwayne Phillips

This is urgent. Is it?

adjective: urgent

(of a state or situation) requiring immediate action or attention.

Immediate attention. Do it right now!

That is a relative statement. Someone else tells me, “Do it before doing these other things on this list that someone has created. I deem this more important than those.”

Ah, now we are getting somewhere. This is about the other person and their perspective on the world. And they have decided what I should do, now.

I have a different perspective. I have a different list.

If my salary depends on me doing what the other person says, and this item isn’t going to betray my ethics or in some way ruin my life, then okay, I will do this thing first, right now.

Otherwise, I will act from my perspective and choose what I believe to be important or urgent.

by Dwayne Phillips

Sometimes we do things backwards and expect everyone else to know.

Here in the year of the virus, I sit outside a nationally recognized chain of coffee shops (whose name begins with an “S”) viewing the Internet and occasionally writing blog posts….(is that a long-enough opening sentence?)…

But anyways, in the year of the virus, customers (the paying type) must enter the establishment through one door, purchase their caffeine-laden beverages, grab-and-go, and exit through another door. I am sitting outside the exit door, so I have an excellent view of this otherwise most-non-excellent arrangement.

The exit door is one of those double doors. There is a right side and a left side. Here in America, we drive on the right side of the road. We walk on the right side of the sidewalk. We traverse the right side of everything we traverse. It is sort of a social agreement. Right?

Well, as paying customers exit this S—-, they push on the right door only to find it locked. They push it a few more times in the belief that they just didn’t push it hard enough the first couple of times. They eventually push the left door to learn that it is unlocked. The right door is locked; the left door is unlocked.

I suppose there is some good historical reason why the doors are locked and unlocked in this seemingly backwards arrangement. There must be as the managers of this S— are neither stupid nor diabolical.

Here is an idea: block the right door with a chair or some other door-blocking device so that your paying customers know that they should use the left door. That way, they won’t be so troubled while exiting after paying for their caffeine-laden beverages.

I suppose there is some good historical reason why the locked door isn’t blocked. There must be as the managers of this S— are neither stupid nor diabolical.

Why do we do these things to ourselves? We change a convention without telling anyone else that we are doing things backwards. Humor? Who knows? It is obvious to me, so it must be obvious to you. Right? Perhaps not.

Anyways, life goes on in the year of the virus.